MULAN (2020) [a Film Review]


SPOILERS AHEAD (but honestly, who cares?)


 

Strengths:

  1. Good attempt at wuxia
    • Bringing in an Asian cinematic style to compliment the cinematography
  2. Mulan’s androgenous face
    • Liu Yifei’s facial features could (just barely) pull off as a man
  3. Wide shots
    • Shows off scenic landscapes of New Zealand and China

Problems:

  1. The overemphasis with ‘chi’ or ‘qi’
    • Over-mythologizes a story of a regular being’s struggle against identity
  2. Oversaturation of symmetrical shots
    • The shots look great but grows old fast
  3. A pointless phoenix
    • Doesn’t add to the story, and oversimplifies the meaning of a phoenix in Chinese culture
  4. Forced dialogue
    • Words sound like white people Orientalising Chinese sayings
  5. Rushed story
    • Does not give enough nuance to Mulan’s decision to leave or fight
  6. Mulan’s prodigal talents
    • Gives off the impression that only with talent can you be better than other men
  7. Unnecessary shower scene
    • Unnecessarily sexualises Mulan in attempt to remind audiences of her femininity
  8. Chose to reveal identity
    • Defeats the message about the two hares – that while one is male and other is female, when they run together they are indistinguishable from the other
  9. “I believe Hua Mulan”
    • Political reference aside, the men had not enough interaction to be impressed by Mulan and her honesty
  10. Xianniang
    • Not enough backstory to empathise with her; sole purpose is to die for Mulan to live
  11. Jet Li and Donnie Yen under-utilised
    • Neither of the actors well-known for their martial arts and wuxia roles did much to display their prowess
  12. Fireworks?
    • You have fireworks for display, but not as weapons?

Beautifully shot, but no attempt in improving or complimenting the original poem or its themes.

1 / 5


 

Leave a comment